Conflict Theory, Intellectual Roots

The basic elements of conflict theory were set out by Karl Marx and Max Weber who shared two basic concerns:

Conflict theory in sociology is the creation of :

KARL MARX


Marx came to see his own writing as upending Hegel – replacing Hegel’s emphasis on mind as the crucial determinant of history with his own materialist philosophy

Communist Manifesto: sets out a program for a revolutionary government and outlines his theory of social structures and social change

People have a clearly defined nature – species being

If people do not behave in accordance with these interests it means that they have been deceived about what their “true interests” are by a social system that works in others’ favor

His analysis focuses on the conflicts between different social groups with different interests

He was interested in the link between the nature of ideology and the interests of those who develop them

The “ruling ideas” are the ideas of the ruling class

Emphasized the primacy of technology

The determining force in people’s lives was their relationship to property

Max Weber

Weber wanted to identify the origins of essential characteristics of modern society but viewed modern rationality as an “iron cage” of bureaucracy

Viewed people’s behavior as large self-interested

Stressed the importance of values and goals specific to a society

In the Protestant Ethic: suggested that the Calvinists’ desire to save their souls found expression in the goal of accumulating wealth, seen as evidence of god’s favor, but actually enjoying wealth would be a sinful indulgence

Analyzed the way people maneuver in pursuit of advantage in terms of both particular values and circumstances and more general sociological categories

Formulated the concept of Ideal Types

Concerned with power and the way people obtain domination over others

Authority: legitimate domination – certain people have a right to be obeyed

Charismatic: authority rests on a leader’s personal qualities

Traditional: also personal but based on tradition

Rational-Legal: derived from formal rules

Viewed the economy as important but not the sole determinant of both social structure and people’s chances in life


Stressed the importance of class, party and status groups

Class: people who share the same position economically

Party: an association that exists to secure power or attain ideal or material advantages for its members
Status group: lies in shared distinctiveness – such as college professors

Viewed ideas and values as having an independent effect on history

Emphasized the importance of legitimacy – the belief that someone’s position and the system incorporating it are right and proper